GeoJSON
{"type":"Feature","geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":[[[[73,38.6],[73.1,38.59],[73.18,38.65],[73.2,38.66],[73.31,38.69],[73.51,38.71],[73.52,38.59],[73.43,38.59],[73.38,38.56],[73.3,38.54],[73.26,38.55],[73.23,38.53],[73.19,38.54],[73.09,38.58],[72.99,38.59],[73,38.6]]]]}}
Age
The stratigraphic age of the ~2.5 km thick strata of the Tuzguny-Terezki and Zortashkol thrust sheets - based on fossil algae is debated; Dronov et al. [2006] suggested a Meso-Neoproterozoic (Riphean) age; Vlasov et al. [1991] posited a Cambrian-Silurian age. The youngest detrital Zrn U-Pb age group of ~605 Ma in one sample supports the presence of Ediacaran strata. The Zortashkol thrust sheet contains >3 km of Silurian to Cretaceous strata. Strata that unconformably cover the Tuzguny-Terezki and Zortashkol thrust sheets were originally classi ed as Cretaceous and Paleogene [Yushin et al., 1964] but revised to Cretaceous by Vlasov et al. [1991]. Dronov et al. [2006] questioned all evidence for Paleogene deposits. (Rutte et al., 2017). Hence adjusted as Wenlock for schematic stratigraphic column purpose.
Compiler:
Extracted from Rutte, D., L. Ratschbacher, S. Schneider, K. Stübner, M. A. Stearns, M. A. Gulzar, and B. R. Hacker (2017), Building the Pamir-Tibetan Plateau—Crustal stacking, extensional collapse, and lateral extrusion in the Central Pamir: 1. Geometry and kinematics, Tectonics, 36, 342–384, doi:10.1002/2016TC004293.